John Forsythe
Queensland Health,
Director, PricewaterhouseCoopers Australia Australia
John Forsythe is a Director in the PwC Health Practice in Australia. He
has 12 years experience consulting in healthcare and major service
industries in Australia and the United States. His core areas of expertise
are in change and benefits management, particularly as they relate to
healthcare technology implementations. The role he played on the EDS
Project was as the Change Manager for the first wave of statewide
implementations. It is important to note that the EDS Project has moved
considerably since this article was written - the application is now
deployed by Queensland Health in 100+ hospitals across the state.
Andria MacDonald
Queensland Health, PricewaterhouseCoopers Australia
Emily Wilhelm
Queensland Health, PricewaterhouseCoopers Australia
Efficacy of Electronic Discharge Summaries: A Case Study Demonstrating Early Results at Two Hospitals
John Forsythe, Andria MacDonald, Emily Wilhelm, Melanie Strachan, David Evans
Abstract
Paper objectives or hypothesis: Queensland Health is in the process of rolling out a web-based, electronic discharge summary to hospitals which request a move from the status quo (usually paper-based, triplicate forms). This paper aims to test whether the move to an electronic discharge summary can improve clinical outcomes through a demonstrable improvement in delivery, quality and speed. Methods: This paper focuses on two public hospitals of approximately the same size and clinical mix. One of the hospitals was interested in the electronic summary based on dissatisfaction with the paper-based summary and was used as a baseline case (Hospital A). The second hospital used the electronic discharge summary for approximately 18 months prior to the study, and the electronic summary was well ingrained into day-to-day business processes (Hospital B). Results and discussion of implications: • Delivery: The data indicate that for Hospital A only 39% of completed paper summaries were received by the GP, while 82% of summaries were received by the GP using the electronic summary. • Quality: Satisfaction with Hospital A summaries was 7% while Hospital B received a 93% satisfaction rating. • Speed: Qualitative feedback strongly suggested a marked improvement in speed. Hospital B sent 75% of summaries within 48 hours. Conclusion: This case highlights that the electronic discharge summary may contribute to improved clinical outcomes, however further research is required to establish this conclusively. The measures included did demonstrate measurable, quantifiable gains for both delivery and quality. Speed was strongly supported through qualitative evidence.
Keywords
Discharge Summary; Electronic Health Records; Queensland Health; GP Satisfaction